Home    Bloggers    Messages    Resources    Webinars    DesignCon 2013   
Tw  |  Fb  |  In  |  Rss
Barry J. Sullivan

The Making of a Technical Program

Barry J. Sullivan
Martin Rowe
Martin Rowe
10/31/2012 3:58:33 PM
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Mixed reviews
Those proposals that may just miss getting into the conference program still have value. Could we use this forum as a way for those authors to get some exposure? Should we?

50%
50%
Barry J. Sullivan
Barry J. Sullivan
10/31/2012 3:44:13 PM
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Mixed reviews
The big fear when you see large disparities among reviews is that it's evidence of bias against an author or organization.  Happily, closer inspection of individual cases has shown this is rarely the case.  More often, it's the result of different perspectives on a topic or different standards for rating proposals.

We have increased the number of reviewers per proposal over the years to make it easier to spot outliers.  Track organizers are encouraged to exercise their judgment, especially when reviews appear inconsistent, using reviewers' ratings as a starting point rather than the final word on how to rank a proposal.

50%
50%
Brian Bailey
Brian Bailey
10/31/2012 3:20:30 PM
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Mixed reviews
If the reason for it is one reviewer is more knowledgeable than the other, then no, but if they are equally knowledgeable then I believe it should as it indicates contention. There are also areas in which I have flagged papers with low scores to be included. An example is in the area of functional verification. If the reviewers are a mix of academics and industry people and it is a paper about a simulation technique - the academics will give it a low score because the results cannot be proven or they think it contains no new content. But to an industry person it may be an amazing breakthrough. Similarly an academic paper that shows at 10% improvement in capacity or speed or cases that work for a formal property checker will get high marks from an academic and low marks from an industry person.

50%
50%
Martin Rowe
Martin Rowe
10/31/2012 2:52:25 PM
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Mixed reviews
Brian,

Are you saying that if a paper gets high and low scors as opposed to all average scoes that it's more likely to make it into the program?

50%
50%
Brian Bailey
Brian Bailey
10/31/2012 2:36:53 PM
User Rank
Blogger
Mixed reviews
I always find it interesting when a paper has been given both great reviews and bad reviews. In some cases it is clear that one reviewer had access to information that the other one didn't and demonstrates why multiple reviewers for each paper is a good thing. For other paper it identifies exciting, possibly contentious issues that create a polarized view or solution. These can often be the most fun topics and identifying them often means that not only the average but the deviation have to be considered in the selection process.

50%
50%
Martin Rowe
Martin Rowe
10/31/2012 9:18:56 AM
User Rank
Blogger
Technical program committee meeting
Sitting in as an observer on this year's technical program committee meeting, I'd say that "thorough and lively" was a bit of an understatement, but that's a good thing. The commitment to a strong technical program was clear.

50%
50%
More Blogs from Barry J. Sullivan
Just because a few entrepreneurs make a lot of money without holding college degrees doesn't mean you shouldn't pursue an engineering degree.
We need to inspire young people to become engineers.
Will technical conferences change in order to reach the next generation of engineers?
How HP's (Agilent's) Design SuperCon evolved into DesignCon.
Barry Sullivan, with quotes from Agilent's Karl Kachigan, explains how DesignCon started.
flash poll
follow us on twitter
like us on facebook
webinars
archived
4/9/2013 1:00:00 PM

High speed digital chip-to-chip link performance is often limited by jitter in the multigigabit per second regime. It is a surprising fact that jitter can actually be amplified by a lossy channel even when the channel is linear, passive, and noiseless. In this webcast we will cover the basics of jitter amplification and show you how to accurately analysis the effect in your system using ADS Channel Simulator.
DesignCon Community
About Us     Contact Us     Help     Register     Twitter     Facebook     RSS